Thinking About Design
Please note: This post has moved
This week, we are fortunate to have a series of events at NESTA with three leading thinkers/speakers from the world of innovation.
Firstly on Tuesday evening, we are hosting Designerly Thinking with Bill Moggridge, founder of IDEO, one of the most successful design firms in the world and one of the first to integrate the design of software and hardware into the practice of industrial design. Then on Thursday, at the launch of NESTA Connect, we have Professor Eric von Hippel, Professor of Management of Innovation and Entrepreneurship at MIT and best known for his work developing the concept of user innovation (see his excellent book ‘Democratizing Innovation’). Finally, on Friday Karim Lakhani from the Harvard Business School, will be hosting a policy breakfast on the emergence of open source software communities and their unique innovation strategies.
In different ways, each of these events for me signals the growing awareness of the importance of design, or user-led thinking, in the development of better products, services or processes. By design, I don't mean funky kettles or stylish cars, though obviously these would be nice to have. Rather, I mean innovating from the user’s perspective to make products, services or processes easier to use through making them more intuitive. This sounds so blatantly obvious, it is easy to dismiss and yet we come across bad design in our lives so often we barely notice it. This weekend I was struck by the appalling (lack of) design of a local pedestrian crossing that makes crossing the road very difficult and very dangerous - I'd love the person who designed the crossing to actually try and use it and I can feel a letter to the council brewing. On the other hand I am an avid user of Streetcar, the pay-as-you-go car, which is very convenient and easy to use, and makes car ownership unnecessary in dense urban environments such as London. I believe the Streetcar service was developed by one of the emerging breed of service-design companies live|work.
This week sees the launch NESTA Connect which aims to build the UKs capacity for innovation through collaboration. Our focus is upon stimulating new, unexpected or extreme collaborations between different research disciplines, difference types of organisations and disparate communities. It is no accident that two out of the first three NESTA Connect projects have design at their core. I’ll post again soon with more information about these projects very soon. In the meantime, I'd be interested to hear of more unusual examples of good or bad design in action.
I am often shocked by the poorly considered design of cycle lanes. Have a look here for some photos: http://www.warringtoncyclecampaign.co.uk/facility-of-the-month/
(I particularly like October 2006)
Posted by: Miko Coffey | 12 Jun 2007 09:54:45
Love the website. Very funny, thanks. Funnily enough I took my life into my own hands cycling to my local well known Swedish Furniture Emporium at the weekend.
As is the way with these places, it was located in an industrial wasteland so cycling there wasn't just difficult but virtually discouraged. I particularly enjoyed trying to get across a 6 lane A road as cars and lorries were hurtling past at 60mph.
I was therefore delighted to discover an unsignposted cycle path on the way home but then less delighted that it was completely overgrown and unusable in places due to the odd tree or branch that was blocking it.
I lived in Berlin for a few years where virtually everyroad has a cycle path complete with their own integrated traffic lights which is amazing.
So I agree, UK cycle paths a great example of appaling design.
PS. Reminds me of a joke. A black piece or tarmac and a red piece of tarmac walk into a bar. The black piece of tarmac says to the barman: "don't serve him, he's a cycle path." hohoho
Posted by: Roland Harwood | 12 Jun 2007 10:10:54